Diverse Standards Reflect Market Needs and History
Plastic pipes, made from polymers like PVC, PE, and PP, offer advantages over traditional materials such as lead or copper due to properties like lower weight, corrosion resistance, flexibility, and ease of connection. These pipes are used in both pressure (gas, water) and non-pressure (drain, waste, venting (DWV), sewers) applications. Standards bodies globally ensure good practices for production and installation. Pipe standards and dimensions vary significantly worldwide.
Key Standards Bodies and Design Philosophies
In the USA, common standards include ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), with sizes like IPS (Iron Pipe Size), CTS (Copper Tube Size), and C900/C905 for pressure pipes. Japan uses the JIS (Japanese Industry Standard), while Europe primarily follows ISO (International Standard Organisation) and EN (European Norm) standards, though ISO is gaining traction elsewhere. National and US State standards also apply.
For pressure pipes, the design is based on material strength and safety factors. ISO standards utilize Renard figures and extrapolate material strength over 50 years to determine the Minimum Required Strength (MRS). ASTM standards use the Hydrostatic Design Basis (HDB) and extrapolate over 11 years. While similar, there are differences.
Safety factors (C) in pressure pipe design (PN = MRS * (SDR-1) / (2*C)) differ regionally. For PVC water pipe, Europe often uses C=2, resulting in a PN10 pipe for SDR26 with MRS=250 bar. Germany, however, uses C=2.5 for the same pipe, resulting in PN8. Safety factors depend on material toughness, ductility, failure mode, load application, pipe laying conditions, and national rules. PE materials, showing crack tip blunting, may have safety factors as low as 1.25 for water pipes. Modified PVC (MPVC) and Oriented PVC (PVCO) have lower safety factors (1.4-1.6) than standard UPVC (2-2.5), though MPVC also has a lower MRS.
For non-pressure pipes, stiffness is key to resist soil loads. Pipe Stiffness (PS) or Ring Stiffness (STIS) is measured differently. ASTM uses PS in psi, while ISO and EN use STIS in kPa. Structured Wall Pipe standards like EN13476, ISO 21138, and AS/NZS 1260 are functional, prescribing minimum stiffness rather than wall thickness, with some minimum composition requirements like 60-80% PVC content. ASTM F891 is a standard for PVC Cellular DWV pipe. ASTM standards for foam core require closed cells to prevent axial leakage. US sewer standards typically limit mean deflection to 7.5%.
Material choices also vary regionally; CPVC is widely used for Hot and Cold applications in the USA and India. ABS finds use in cold climates like Canada for higher impact resistance and in regions like California where PVC faced bans; ASTM F628 covers ABS Cellular DWV pipe. Jointing preferences differ, with rubber seal joints common for PVC connections and butt welding or electro fusion for PO, though PVC butt welding is promoted for specific applications.
Technical Specifications Considerations
Pressure Rating (PN): Calculated using MRS and SDR, adjusted by regional Safety Factor (C).
Material Strength: MRS (ISO, 50 yrs) vs. HDB (ASTM, 11 yrs).
Stiffness: PS (ASTM, psi or kPa) vs. STIS (ISO/EN, kPa).
Composition Limits: e.g., min PVC content in structured walls (EN vs AS/NZS), CaCO3 limits in foam core (ASTM F891).
FAQ Section
How do regional safety factors impact pipe specifications for the same application?
Regional safety factors (C) directly influence the pressure rating (PN) for a given material strength (MRS) and dimension ratio (SDR). A higher safety factor, as seen in Germany compared to other European countries for PVC water pipe, means a lower pressure rating for the same SDR pipe or requires a thicker wall (lower SDR) to achieve the same pressure rating. This affects required wall thickness and potentially material consumption for a given pressure class.
Why are different testing methods like ASTM and ISO specified for seemingly similar pipe properties?
ASTM and ISO standards evolve based on different historical practices, regional priorities, and material understandings. For pressure pipes, ASTM's HDB and ISO's MRS use different extrapolation periods (11 vs 50 years) for long-term strength. For non-pressure pipes, PS and STIS represent stiffness concepts measured with different units (psi vs kPa) and potentially slightly different test parameters. Even within materials, ISO PE100 requires performance tests like Rapid Crack Propagation (RCP) that were not initially differentiated in ASTM PE3408, reflecting different regional concerns or material advancements. Compliance with specific regional standards is crucial for market acceptance and performance validation.
%20(1).jpg)
Nick Belshof
